Explorations | Submarine Ring of Fire 2006 | Logs

Scientists from the Perspective of the Educator at Sea

May 9, 2006

Lori Savage
Educator at Sea
Rogue Community College Instructor

Melville Gazette Job posting: Research Scientist:
Must be willing to work grueling hours. Excellent problem solving skills and a level head are necessary. Must be highly organized and not concerned with tedium. Job may require getting dirty at times. Must be skilled in sales. Good math and computer skills a must. Salary fluctuates, mostly commission.

More than a week ago, the volcanic island of Anatahan was billowing smoke like an inextinguishable cigar. But our interests on this expedition have been below the sea surface. Each of the seamounts hold their own scientific booty. Jason hovers and crawls like a predator in search of its prey over numerous features on these submarine volcanoes. Successfully, he collects a multitude of samples: geological (rocks and chimneys), biological (snails, barnacles, mussels, flatfish and microbial mat), and chemical (gas and water).

During the dives, one lasting as long as 28 hours, each scientist waits patiently for the right conditions and their turn to direct the sampling. Oftentimes their whole four hour watch time will pass without a chance to sample because Jason was not in their sampling area, or others were sampling, or Medea was repositioning. Only to be called back later to do their specific sampling, and then called again at 4am to deal with their samples because Jason is "coming up."

Bleary eyed but with great anticipation they stumble out on to the flood lamp-lit deck to await the retrieval of their treasures. Knowing that each sample will require extensive time consuming evaluation, and dare I say monotonous testing and retesting back in the lab, doesn't even factor into this moment. "What do we really have in our baskets, our biobox, the cylinders, niskin bottles and gastights on Jason tonight? What discovery will we have made?"

Would you want a career like this? If you are passionate about a subject, I would hope that your answer would be yes. It seems to me that this passionate career path is similar to a mature love relationship, in which you may fall head over heals into it at first, but then somewhere along the line you make a conscious decision that this is worth your time and commitment. (Just in time to convince others it is worth their time and money to sponsor your research.)

As an instructor, this experience at sea has got me pondering the teaching methods of the day. Are we as educators focused on the right things? Are we steering away from "edu" tainment, "keeping their interest" or simply babysitting? Are we doing all that we can to spark the fires that lead to curious, passionate people? People who want to pursue answers to questions that others have yet to think of? I hope so – because it seems to me that this is how we will keep on the forefront of science and technology. This is how we'll ebb suffering in our world while explaining the unknowns.